Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Adam (host)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Adam (host)[edit]

Mike Adam (host) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about completely non-notable individual. A google search yields no coverage in secondary sources, only his profiles at places he worked on. It was written by his wife and was the only contribution made by that account. Its clear to see that this person has done nothing noteworthy. NØ 18:32, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The article looks like an attempted promotion. Most sources found online are promotional listings in industry databases and the like, and brief mentions that he was present at some local event, but there is very little evidence of independent notability from reliable media sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Local market radio DJs are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, but nothing stated here gets him over the "special notability case" bar he has to clear and none of it is properly referenced to reliable source coverage in real media independent of his own employers for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Aoba47 (talk) 02:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the nominator and above Thalium (talk) 21:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.